LLMs as Assistants for Data Annotation: Addressing Disagreement and Supporting Expert Processes

Abstract

This paper investigates the potential of Large Language Models to assist human annotation pipelines, with a particular focus on supporting the development of expert-informed annotation guidelines for document-level content categorisation. We present three experiments exploring distinct roles for LLMs in annotation: as annotators, as domain experts assisting in disagreement resolution, and as analysts of annotator discussions. Using GPT-4.5 and Claude Sonnet 4, we evaluate LLM-generated annotation guidelines for a document-level classification tasks in terms of coverage, applicability, and usefulness. Preliminary results are mixed-to-positive, with evidence that LLMs can provide useful support across different stages of the annotation pipeline, particularly when supplied with rich contextual information such as prior human annotations and annotator discussions. However, their effectiveness remains sensitive to prompting strategies and input configuration.

Resources

Details