Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-speakable-09

Addressing Accent Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Comparative Study of Single and Two-Step Adaptation

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Addressing Accent Disparities in Automatic Speech Recognition: A Comparative Study of Single and Two-Step Adaptation

Abstract

Automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems often exhibit uneven performance across accents, raising concerns about fairness and bias. This study investigates the impact of model fine-tuning strategies on ASR performance and accent-related disparities. We conduct a controlled empirical evaluation of two adaptation approaches—single-step and two-step fine-tuning—using pretrained Whisper (small) and Wav2Vec2-XLSR-53 models on African-accented English speech from the AfriSpeech-200 dataset, covering Yoruba, Igbo, Swahili, and Hausa accents. Both fine-tuning strategies substantially reduced mean word error rate (WER) for all models. However, these improvements did not translate into consistent reductions in accent-related performance gaps. When analysed separately across general and clinical subsets, WER gaps often increased due to uneven gains across accents. Although two-step fine-tuning provided modest improvements over single-step adaptation, its impact on reducing disparities remained limited. These findings indicate that fine-tuning primarily optimises performance without effectively addressing systematic bias across speaker groups, even when models are specialised for individual accents. This highlights the limitations of per-accent specialisation as a practical bias mitigation strategy.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.