Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-signlang-37

Assisting Corpus Annotation: Automatic BIO-Tagging of Clause-Like Units in Polish Sign Language. A Pilot Study on Corpus Data

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Assisting Corpus Annotation: Automatic BIO-Tagging of Clause-Like Units in Polish Sign Language. A Pilot Study on Corpus Data

Abstract

The creation of large-scale sign language corpora is often bottlenecked by the labour-intensive process of multi-layered annotation that requires manual analysis. One of the annotation steps is the challenging and time-consuming task of segmenting continuous signing into clause-like-units (CLUs). In this paper, we propose an automated segmentation framework for Polish Sign Language (PJM) designed to support manual annotation. To detect sentence boundaries, we adapt the Multi-Stage Temporal Convolutional Network (MS-TCN) architecture, enhanced with a Channel Attention mechanism, to effectively fuse multimodal skeleton features (hands, body, and face) extracted via MediaPipe. We evaluate the model on a diverse subset of the PJM Corpus (40 video files, 25 signers), containing nearly 16,000 manually annotated clauses prior to the start of this study. The proposed method achieves a Segmental F1-score of 75.43% at IoU = 0.10 and 57.52% at IoU = 0.50, demonstrating a strong capability in localising sentence boundaries. Furthermore, ablation studies reveal that fusing manual kinematics with non-manual prosodic cues (face) yields a significant performance gain (+13.6 pp) over unimodal baselines, empirically confirming the linguistic necessity of incorporating both manual and non-manual articulators in the process of sentence delimitation. The solution offers a viable means for reducing CLU annotation time by automatically generating high-quality clause boundary proposals.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.