Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-readixtsar-17

Language Proficiency as a Recoverable Dimension in Multilingual LLM Embeddings

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Language Proficiency as a Recoverable Dimension in Multilingual LLM Embeddings

Abstract

Understanding whether proficiency is encoded as structured knowledge rather than inferred from surface correlates is critical for interpreting and applying LLMs in educational contexts. We investigate whether multilingual large language model (LLM) embeddings encode language proficiency as a structured recoverable dimension rather than merely supporting predictive classification. Using the UniversalCEFR benchmark, which spans 13 languages and the full proficiency range from A1 to C2, we evaluate the frozen LLM embedding space in two complementary ways. First, we test whether proficiency levels can be predicted directly from frozen embeddings across languages and model variants. The results show that embeddings without task-specific fine-tuning consistently support CEFR classification. Variation in results is strongly associated with the amount of annotated data and language family, suggesting that data availability and cross-linguistic structure matter more than architectural differences. Second, we examine how CEFR levels are organized inside embedding space. We find that texts from lower to higher proficiency levels align along a consistent ordered direction, with higher levels systematically positioned further along this gradient. Distances between levels increase proportionally to their ordinal gap (e.g., A1 vs. C2 is farther apart than B1 vs. B2), indicating a continuous proficiency continuum rather than arbitrary clusters. Together, these findings show that CEFR is not only predictable from multilingual LLM embeddings but is also internally structured as an ordered representational dimension.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.