Request Correction

The Linguist’s Lie Detector: Linguistic Knowledge in Large Language Models

We present a benchmark and evaluation pipeline for assessing how well large language models (LLMs) handle linguistic knowledge. Starting from a curated subcorpus of 11 syntax-focused articles published in Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics (2016–2026), we design a pipeline that (1) segments article text into sentences, (2) extracts atomic, verifiable statements, and (3) classifies them into linguistic categories (language-specific, typological, theoretical, citation, or structural). Each stage is evaluated against human gold annotations produced by three annotators, with inter-annotator agreement measured via Krippendorff’s α and Cohen’s κ. We compare several LLMs on extraction and classification, using BERTScore-style similarity for extraction and macro F1 for classification. Finally, we generate contradictions of the true linguistic statements and test whether LLMs can distinguish true from false claims. On a challenge set of 705 linguistic statements, we compare eight LLMs, with Gemini 3 Flash achieving the highest F1 score of 0.66, indicating that current models possess limited but non-trivial linguistic knowledge.