Request Correction
Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.
Correction Guidelines
- Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
- Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
- Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.
Paper Information
Quantifying and Predicting Disagreement in Graded Human Ratings
Paper Fields
Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
Quantifying and Predicting Disagreement in Graded Human Ratings
It is increasingly recognized that humans do not always agree, and disagreement is inherent in many annotation tasks. However, not all items in a given task elicit the same level of opinion divergence. In this paper, we study the extent to which item-level annotation variation and variation structure can be captured from text features, focusing on inappropriate language detection, including offensive language, hate speech, and toxic language detection. We model annotation variation to assess whether the degree of annotation divergence can be predicted from item-level textual features. We also propose the Opposition Index, a metric that quantifies the extent of opposing stances among annotators based on their Likert ratings.
Authors
Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.
PDF Attachment
You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.
Your Information
Author Declaration *
Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.