Request Correction

Combating Disinformation: Is There No Alternative?

This position paper critiques the dominance of detection-centered approaches in misinformation research. We argue that the prevailing paradigm treats information disorders as a content-level anomaly to be identified and suppressed, thereby obscuring the structural conditions under which different forms of information disorders emerge and resonate. Drawing on critical anthropology, we propose an alternative "clinical" model: information disorders should be understood not only as informational distortion, but as a syndrome with complex causes embedded in contexts of economic precarity, institutional distrust, and informational inequality. Treating detection as the ends rather than the means of intervention risks misguiding our efforts. Rather than positioning NLP primarily as a tool for boundary enforcement, we outline a reorientation toward structural diagnosis: diversifying data beyond WEIRD contexts, extracting socioeconomic and trust-related signals from discourse, and integrating computational outputs within interdisciplinary causal frameworks. Under this model, detection becomes a means for an epidemiology of discourse, subordinated to the broader objective of cultivating long-term epistemic resilience in our online environments.