Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-fnp-16

Improving Verbatim Financial Causality Extraction with Supervised Fine-Tuning and Prompt Repetition

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Improving Verbatim Financial Causality Extraction with Supervised Fine-Tuning and Prompt Repetition

Abstract

This paper investigates the application of generative Large Language Models (LLMs) for strict verbatim span extraction. We evaluate our methodology within the FinCausal 2026 shared task. Because generative LLMs optimize next-token probability rather than strict boundaries, they naturally suffer from over-generation and boundary drift in extraction tasks. To address this, we introduce a generalized structural training constraint, extending prompt repetition from a purely inference-time heuristic to a training-time supervision framework. By incorporating duplicated prompts directly into Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT), we hypothesize that this encourages the model to internalize a form of unidirectional cross-reading behavior, leading to stronger alignment between generated spans and the source context for exact extraction. Evaluating on open-weights (Qwen2.5-14B-Instruct-1M) and proprietary (GPT-4.1-Nano) architectures, we find this soft attention constraint improves Exact Match scores for open models and helps balance cross-lingual performance disparities. Conversely, the proprietary model exhibited sensitivity to prompt duplication, achieving its highest score without repetition. Ultimately, our deterministic SFT approach secured 4th place in the Spanish subtask (4.73) and 6th place in the English subtask (4.70), indicating the viability of structurally simple, natively fine-tuned models compared to complex multi-stage pipelines.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.