Request Correction
Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.
Correction Guidelines
- Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
- Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
- Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.
Paper Information
Lakefront AI Ramblers at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: Hybrid Retrieval and LLM Verification for Open-Source Schema-Guided Clinical Information Extraction
Paper Fields
Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
Lakefront AI Ramblers at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: Hybrid Retrieval and LLM Verification for Open-Source Schema-Guided Clinical Information Extraction
Schema-constrained clinical information extraction requires identifying text-supported observations and outputting exact schema identifiers and values. In the MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026 shared task, synthetic nursing dictations were mapped to structured JSON outputs aligned with a 193-concept clinical schema under strict exact-match evaluation. We extended the baseline pipeline, which consists of transcript segmentation, schema retrieval, and LLM-based extraction, with hybrid schema retrieval, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of open-source LLMs, and LLM-based verification. Our hybrid retrieval approach combined dense embeddings with sparse BM25 representations using a convex combination strategy, improving schema coverage to 0.994 recall@60 on the development set. We evaluated GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, applying LoRA-based SFT to open-source models. On the official test set, our best submitted configuration (Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-SFT with union voting and GPT-4o-mini verification) achieved 0.711 F1. Post-competition experiments showed that Llama-3-8B-Instruct-SFT (train + dev) reached 0.723 F1 under the same post-processing pipeline. For reference, GPT-4o achieved 0.791 F1 and did not benefit from post-processing. Performance differences across development and test splits further highlight the sensitivity of post-processing strategies to variation across split distribution. Overall, integrating high-recall retrieval, SFT, and LLM verification substantially narrows the performance gap between open- and closed-source models for schema guided clinical extraction.
Authors
Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.
PDF Attachment
You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.
Your Information
Author Declaration *
Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.