Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-clinicalnlp-23

Lakefront AI Ramblers at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: Hybrid Retrieval and LLM Verification for Open-Source Schema-Guided Clinical Information Extraction

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Lakefront AI Ramblers at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: Hybrid Retrieval and LLM Verification for Open-Source Schema-Guided Clinical Information Extraction

Abstract

Schema-constrained clinical information extraction requires identifying text-supported observations and outputting exact schema identifiers and values. In the MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026 shared task, synthetic nursing dictations were mapped to structured JSON outputs aligned with a 193-concept clinical schema under strict exact-match evaluation. We extended the baseline pipeline, which consists of transcript segmentation, schema retrieval, and LLM-based extraction, with hybrid schema retrieval, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of open-source LLMs, and LLM-based verification. Our hybrid retrieval approach combined dense embeddings with sparse BM25 representations using a convex combination strategy, improving schema coverage to 0.994 recall@60 on the development set. We evaluated GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Llama-3-8B-Instruct, and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct, applying LoRA-based SFT to open-source models. On the official test set, our best submitted configuration (Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct-SFT with union voting and GPT-4o-mini verification) achieved 0.711 F1. Post-competition experiments showed that Llama-3-8B-Instruct-SFT (train + dev) reached 0.723 F1 under the same post-processing pipeline. For reference, GPT-4o achieved 0.791 F1 and did not benefit from post-processing. Performance differences across development and test splits further highlight the sensitivity of post-processing strategies to variation across split distribution. Overall, integrating high-recall retrieval, SFT, and LLM verification substantially narrows the performance gap between open- and closed-source models for schema guided clinical extraction.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.