Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-clinicalnlp-22

HSE NLP TEAM at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: Consensus Adjudication Ensemble (ACE): Balancing Precision and Recall for Schema-Bystander Clinical Extraction

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

HSE NLP TEAM at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: Consensus Adjudication Ensemble (ACE): Balancing Precision and Recall for Schema-Bystander Clinical Extraction

Abstract

Clinical documentation from nurse dictations is labor-intensive and error-prone, yet it contains high-value observations that must be transferred into structured flowsheets. The MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026 shared task evaluates systems that extract and ontology-align 193 clinical concepts (with heterogeneous value types) from synthetic speech transcripts derived from intensive care notes. We describe the Consensus Adjudication Ensemble (ACE), a three-stage pipeline that (i) maximizes candidate coverage via complementary generators, (ii) enforces high precision through a dedicated adjudicator that operates as a verifier rather than a generator, and (iii) restores strict schema compliance using a targeted, token-efficient repair step. On the official test set we achieve an exact-match micro-F1 of 0.7996 (P=0.7812, R=0.8188), ranking 4th on the leaderboard. Beyond the competitive result, we analyze clinically relevant failure modes - hallucinated interventions, over-confident categorical labels, and unit/normalization errors - and quantify adjudication trade-offs: 2,219 candidates removed, 91.3% of which are true false positives, at the cost of 8.7% mistakenly removed true positives. Finally, targeted schema repair reduces validation context from approx. 230k tokens to <2k per document while preserving most extraction gains. Keywords: clinical information extraction, nurse dictations, ontology alignment, ensemble methods, adjudication, error analysis


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.