Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-clinicalnlp-14

SQUCS at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: A Multi-Agent Open Source LLM System for Nursing Observation Extraction

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

SQUCS at MEDIQA-SYNUR 2026: A Multi-Agent Open Source LLM System for Nursing Observation Extraction

Abstract

Clinical nursing documentation contains detailed observational information that is essential for patient monitoring and clinical decision-making, yet this information is predominantly recorded in free-text form. The MEDIQA-SYNUR shared task addresses this challenge by requiring systems to extract structured nursing observations from clinical transcripts under strict constraints on evidence grounding and value normalization. In this work, we present a multi-agent large language model (LLM)–based system for the MEDIQA-SYNUR task. We utilize the Llama3 open source LLM for this purpose for ease of local deployment within hospital digital infrastructure. Our system decomposes the extraction process into specialized agents responsible for schema-guided extraction, rule-based validation, and precision-oriented filtering. Starting from a baseline multi-agent pipeline, we conduct a systematic error analysis over the entire development set, examining all false positive and false negative predictions. Our final configuration, selected after extensive exploration and error analysis, combined transcript segmentation, the precision agent, and a suppression table derived from development-set analysis. On the development set, this setup achieved an F1 score of 0.6930 (precision = 0.6427, recall = 0.7518). Applying the same configuration directly to the test set, without any additional tuning, yielded an F1 score of 0.5923 (precision = 0.5292, recall = 0.6725). These results represent the most effective balance of precision and recall achieved through our iterative refinements and reflect the final state of the system as submitted for the competition


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.