Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-cl4health-27

Diagnostic Reasoning with Large Language Models for a Rare Disease: Case Study of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Diagnostic Reasoning with Large Language Models for a Rare Disease: Case Study of Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

Abstract

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is a rare pediatric lung disease that is frequently underdiagnosed due to nonspecific early symptoms and limited clinical exposure. We investigate whether large language models (LLMs) can support early diagnostic reasoning using real-world pediatric pulmonology notes written before the final diagnosis. We curated 58 de-identified first-visit notes (28 confirmed PCD, 30 controls) and evaluated five open-source LLMs using a standardized zero-shot prompt to produce structured outputs, including PCD evaluation recommendations, justifications, and suggested tests. Quantitative performance was assessed against expert-validated labels using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, and a clinician qualitatively reviewed all explanations and testing recommendations for clinical soundness. Sensitivity ranged from 0.48 to 1.00 and specificity from 0.10 to 0.48 (excluding uncertain outputs), with a best accuracy of 0.75. A majority-vote ensemble of five open-source LLMs achieved perfect sensitivity (1.00) with accuracy of 0.73. While models often identified clinically relevant signals in unstructured notes, explanations and testing recommendations were frequently only partially sound. These findings suggest LLMs may serve as cautious early screening aids for rare disease suspicion, but not as standalone diagnostic tools. This work further highlights the need for larger, multi-site evaluation on longitudinal clinical text.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.