Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-ws-cl4health-02

COACH Meets QUORUM: A Framework and Pipeline for Aligning User, Expert, and Developer Perspectives in LLM-Generated Health Counselling

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

COACH Meets QUORUM: A Framework and Pipeline for Aligning User, Expert, and Developer Perspectives in LLM-Generated Health Counselling

Abstract

Systems that collect data on sleep, mood, and activities can provide valuable lifestyle counselling to populations affected by chronic disease and its consequences. Such systems are, however, challenging to develop; in addition to reliably extracting patterns from user-specific data, systems should contextualise these patterns with validated medical knowledge to ensure the quality of counselling and generate counselling that is relevant to a real user. We present QUORUM, an evaluation framework that unifies these developer-, expert-, and user-centric perspectives, and show with a real case study that it meaningfully tracks convergence and divergence in stakeholder perspectives. We also present COACH, a Large Language Model-driven pipeline to generate personalised lifestyle counselling for our Healthy Chronos use case, a diary app for cancer patients and survivors. Applying our framework indicates that, overall, users, medical experts, and developers converge on the view that the generated counselling is relevant, of good quality, and reliable. However, stakeholders also diverge on the tone of the counselling, sensitivity to errors in pattern-extraction, and potential hallucinations. These findings highlight the importance of multi-stakeholder evaluation for consumer health language technologies and illustrate how a unified evaluation framework can support trustworthy, patient-centered NLP systems in real-world settings.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.