Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-main-859

A Benchmark Dataset and Comparative Evaluation of Phonemized and Romanized Urdu for Text-to-Speech

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

A Benchmark Dataset and Comparative Evaluation of Phonemized and Romanized Urdu for Text-to-Speech

Abstract

Text-to-Speech (TTS) system for the Urdu language presents significant challenges, primarily due to the scarcity of high-quality datasets and an insufficient focus on modeling pronunciation. Urdu is spoken by 250 million people worldwide, but its research on computational linguistics remains underrepresented. In this paper, we introduce URDUTTS, a comprehensive and publicly available Urdu TTS dataset containing 89 hours of studio-quality speech, with accompanying transcriptions in three formats: Urdu Script, Phonemized Script, and Romanized Script. The dataset includes both mono-speaker and multi-speaker configurations. As Urdu relies heavily on phonetic features, accurate pronunciation is highly essential for the language. Therefore, we benchmark our dataset using VITS and GlowTTS models to compare the widely used Romanized script format with the Phonemized representation. To make the evaluation highly comprehensive, we combined both objective and subjective evaluation strategies. For objective evaluation, Mel-Cepstral Distortion (MCD with Plain, Dynamic Time-Warping, and Slope-Limitation variants), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), Word Error Rate (WER), and Character Error Rate (CER) were taken. Subjective evaluation was governed by Mean Opinion Score (MOS) ratings from 40 native speakers. Results show that using VITS and GlowTTS with Phonemized transcriptions performs significantly better than Romanized ones, with an improvement of 9.6% and 26.5% in MOS. The data and code are available at github.com/KAABSHAHID/URDUTTS.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.