Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Correction requests are currently disabled.

Paper Information

lrec2026-main-810

PRiSM: Partial Ranking via Inter-layer Semantic Measurement for Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

PRiSM: Partial Ranking via Inter-layer Semantic Measurement for Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models

Abstract

The growing scale of pre-trained language models poses a challenge in fine-tuning for downstream tasks, especially in resource-constrained settings. Recent studies highlight that not all layers in transformer-based language models contribute equally to downstream task performance, giving rise to various partial fine-tuning strategies. However, current methods often introduce significant training overhead or rely on simple heuristics that yield suboptimal performance and poor generalization. We propose PRiSM (Partial Ranking via inter-layer Semantic Measurement), a training-free approach for layer-wise partial fine-tuning that leverages the cosine similarity between pre-trained aggregate token representations across layers to identify inter-layer relationships. PRiSM comprises two stages: (i) scoring layers based on their relevance to the task via a single forward pass, and (ii) fine-tuning a subset of block-wise highest-scoring layers, while keeping others frozen. We conduct experiments on 15 diverse NLP datasets, including single-sentence and sentence-pair classification tasks. Our method achieves competitive performance compared to full fine-tuning, with an average training speedup of 1.5× and a reduction of trainable parameters by 75%, and outperforms all the comparative baselines. Additionally, our approach does not cause any notable drop in performance when the domain is changed for the evaluation tasks, demonstrating robust cross-domain generalizability.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.