Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Paper Information

lrec2026-main-796

Privacy-Preserving Information Extraction with Local LLMs: A Comparative Study on Dutch Debt Collection Letters

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Privacy-Preserving Information Extraction with Local LLMs: A Comparative Study on Dutch Debt Collection Letters

Abstract

For individuals in financial distress, understanding debt collection letters is critical. These documents are often unstructured, use complex legal language, and contain highly sensitive personal data. Automating information extraction is essential for assisting caseworkers, who currently perform this task manually; a slow and error-prone process. The sensitive nature of this data requires efficient, privacy-preserving, locally-deployed solutions. This paper compares the feasibility of various local NLP models for this task. We evaluated a feature-engineered Conditional Random Field (CRF), a fine-tuned spaCy NER model, and several Large Language Models (LLMs) (1.1B to 14B parameters) on a new synthetic dataset of 1,000 Dutch debt letters. Models were compared using accuracy (F1-score) and deployment metrics (CPU runtime, memory usage). Our results show a clear performance-resource trade-off. Lightweight CRF and spaCy models efficiently extracted structured data but failed in many critical unstructured fields. In contrast, LLM performance scaled directly with model size. The 14B DeepSeek model achieved the highest accuracy (95.2% average F1), successfully handling all field types. In conclusion, larger local LLMs are the most viable solution for accurate, private document processing. Alternatively, a hybrid approach using lightweight models for structured data and LLMs only for complex, unstructured fields, would also be adequate.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.