Request Correction

Tracing How Annotators Think: Augmenting Preference Judgments with Reading Processes

We propose an annotation approach that captures not only labels but also the reading process underlying annotators’ decisions, e.g., what parts of the text they focus on, re-read or skim. Using this approach, we conduct a case study on the preference annotation task and create a dataset PreferRead that contains fine-grained annotator reading behaviors obtained from mouse tracking. PreferRead enables detailed analysis of how annotators navigate between a prompt and two candidate responses before selecting their preference. We find that annotators re-read a response in roughly half of all trials, most often revisiting the option they ultimately choose, and rarely revisit the prompt. Reading behaviors are also significantly related to annotation outcomes: re-reading is associated with higher inter-annotator agreement, whereas long reading paths and times are associated with lower agreement. These results demonstrate that reading processes provide a complementary cognitive dimension for understanding annotator reliability, decision-making and disagreement in complex, subjective NLP tasks.