Request Correction
Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.
Correction Guidelines
- Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
- Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
- Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.
Correction requests are currently disabled.
Paper Information
Memorization or Lucky Guesses: Detecting Short Sequences from Copyrighted Dutch News in LLM Output
Paper Fields
Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
Memorization or Lucky Guesses: Detecting Short Sequences from Copyrighted Dutch News in LLM Output
Demonstrating that large language models have memorized copyrighted material is more feasible for high-volume publishers than for smaller outlets whose content appears less frequently online. This study explores how even short, repeated sequences–rather than full articles–can serve as evidence of memorization. Focusing on Dutch news sources included in the mC4 dataset, we test whether GPT-4 and mT5 reproduce excerpts from thousands of articles, including standardized editorial boilerplate. By comparing results to a post-training baseline and modeling memorization as a survival process, we find that repeated, publication-specific phrases are significantly more likely to be completed verbatim. The approach provides a means to detect empirical evidence of memorization in cases where full reproduction is unlikely.
Authors
Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.
PDF Attachment
You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.
Your Information
Author Declaration *
Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.