Request Correction
Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.
Correction Guidelines
- Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
- Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
- Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.
Paper Information
Evaluation of Failure Communication Strategies for Trust Repair in Human-AI Collaboration
Paper Fields
Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
Evaluation of Failure Communication Strategies for Trust Repair in Human-AI Collaboration
The increasing application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in everyday tasks and at work highlights the crucial importance of trust in human-AI collaboration, particularly when an AI system fails. This paper investigates the effectiveness of failure communication strategies for trust repair in collaborative physical tasks involving a a chat-based AI assistant. A controlled experiment in which participants built LEGO cars guided by an LLM-based AI Assistant was used to evaluate whether findings from trust repair in a virtual environment, such as chatbots, translate to an environment comprising tangible tasks, and whether the timing of trust repair influences the outcome. Results indicate that actively communicating mistakes significantly improves trust compared to a no repair strategy, and that early repair tends to be more effective, indicating that failure communication, independent of the timing, is important for an appropriate calibration of trust.
Authors
Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.
PDF Attachment
You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.
Your Information
Author Declaration *
Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.