Request Correction
Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.
Correction Guidelines
- Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
- Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
- Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.
Correction requests are currently disabled.
Paper Information
CEFR Level Prediction for Short Russian L2 Texts: Evaluating Classifiers and Instruction-Based LLMs
Paper Fields
Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
CEFR Level Prediction for Short Russian L2 Texts: Evaluating Classifiers and Instruction-Based LLMs
This study explores the automated prediction of text complexity levels for short Russian texts on the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) scale. The dataset consists of 7,322 nonfictional fragments (15–30 words) extracted from textbooks for learners of Russian as a second language and filtered according to linguistic feature distributions typical of each CEFR level, with additional validation conducted by 4 human experts. Each text fragment was annotated with 127 linguistic features, including lexical, morphological, syntactic, and length-based characteristics. We evaluate several approaches to text complexity assessment: traditional machine learning classifiers, fine-tuned transformer models, and instruction-based large language models (LLMs). Among all models, RuBERT achieved the best strict F1-score (47.8%) and the lowest mean absolute error (0.56), while instruction-based LLMs such as YandexGPT captured overall complexity trends but underperformed in exact classification. Feature ablation experiments demonstrated that lexical features are the most informative for CEFR prediction. Our findings confirm that fine-tuned language models currently offer the most reliable results for short-text CEFR assessment in Russian, whereas instruction-based LLMs show potential for qualitative analysis of text difficulty patterns.
Authors
Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.
PDF Attachment
You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.
Your Information
Author Declaration *
Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.