Back to Home

Request Correction

Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.

Correction Guidelines

  1. Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
  2. Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
  3. Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.

Correction requests are currently disabled.

Paper Information

lrec2026-main-026

Icelandic Math Eval: A Competitive Mathematics Benchmark for Large Language Models

Paper Fields

Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.

Title

Icelandic Math Eval: A Competitive Mathematics Benchmark for Large Language Models

Abstract

We introduce Icelandic Math Eval, the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on competitive mathematics problems in Icelandic. Our dataset comprises 1,027 problems from Icelandic mathematics competitions spanning from 1984 to 2025, covering algebra, geometry, number theory, and combinatorics across ten difficulty levels. We evaluate three state-of-the-art models, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and GPT-5, using a dual evaluation methodology that tests both with and without multiple-choice options. Our results reveal several key findings: (1) models achieve 81-93% overall accuracy, demonstrating substantial cross-lingual transfer of mathematical reasoning capabilities; (2) a dramatic 17.5 percentage point performance drop on problems containing images highlights persistent challenges in multimodal mathematical reasoning; (3) a 6.7 percentage point gap between evaluation modes suggests that multiple-choice formats may overestimate genuine reasoning capabilities; and (4) systematic performance degradation with increasing difficulty, dropping to 43% on the most challenging problems. Using an LLM-as-judge evaluation approach, we provide detailed analysis across problem types, difficulty levels, and model capabilities. This work contributes to multilingual AI evaluation and demonstrates the importance of developing rigorous benchmarks for diverse languages to ensure comprehensive assessment of AI capabilities.


Authors

Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.


PDF Attachment

You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.

Drag & drop a PDF here, or click to select

Your Information

Author Declaration *

Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.