Request Correction
Use this form to request corrections to the paper metadata. Select the fields that need correction and provide the correct information.
Correction Guidelines
- Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
- Fill in the suggested correction value for each field you want to correct.
- Provide your name and email so we can contact you if needed.
Paper Information
Calibrating Resource-light Automatic MT Evaluation: a Cheap Approach to Ranking MT Systems by the Usability of Their Output
Paper Fields
Click the edit button next to a field to report a correction.
Calibrating Resource-light Automatic MT Evaluation: a Cheap Approach to Ranking MT Systems by the Usability of Their Output
MT systems are traditionally evaluated with different criteria, such as adequacy and fluency. Automatic evaluation scores are designed to match these quality parameters. In this paper we introduce a novel parameter - usability (or utility) of output, which was found to integrate both fluency and adequacy. We confronted two automated metrics, BLEU and LTV, with new data for which human evaluation scores were also produced; we then measured the agreement between the automated and human evaluation scores. The resources produced in the experiment are available on the authors' website.
Authors
Expand an author to correct their information. Use the remove button to request author removal, or add a new author.
PDF Attachment
You may attach a PDF as a corrected version of the paper. Max file size: 10MB. Only PDF files are accepted.
Your Information
Author Declaration *
Select at least one field to correct using the edit buttons above.